Bibliografia

Bibliografia de referència :

AAVV (1999). Monographyc on Women’s Studies and the Internet. Resource for feminist research, 24 (1-2).

Andrijasevic, R., Bracke, S. (2003). Venir à la connaissance, venir à la politique Une réflexion sur des pratiques féministes du réseau NextGENDERation. Multitude, 12. Original english version at:
http://multitudes.samizdat.net/article.php3?id_article=1189

Anthias F., Yuval-Davis, N. (1992). Contextualizing feminism. Feminist Review,15.

Banister, P. (1995). Report Writing. En P. Banister, E. Burman, I. Parker, M. Taylor, C. Tindall. Qualitative Methods in Psychology. A Research Guide. (pp.160-179). Buckingham: Open University Press.

Bartolomé, M.; Sandín, M.P.; Del Campo, J. (2002) La investigación cualitativa en educación intercultural: de la comprensión a la transformación educativa. 203-239 En Candau, V.M. (Coord.): Sociedade Educaçao e Cultura(s). Questoes e
propostas. Editora Vozes Ltda.

Bartolomé, Margarita; Cabrera, Flor (2000). Nuevas tendencias en la evaluación de programas de educación multicultural. Revista de Investigación Educativa 18/2: 463-479

Bettina Aptheker. 2002-2003. “Red Feminism: A Personal and Historical
Reflection.” Science & Society 66, no. 4: 519-526.

Bhavnani, K. K. (1990). What’s power got to do with it? Empowerment and social
research. En I. Parker, J. Shotter (eds) Deconstructing Social Psychology.
(pp. 141-152). London: Routledge.
Bhavnani, K. K. (1993). Tracing the contours. Feminist Research and Feminist
Objectivity. Women’s Studies International Forum, 16/2, 95-104.

Bhavnani, K. K., Haraway, D. (1993). Shifting the subject: A conversation between
Kum-Kum Bhavnani y Donna Haraway, 12 April 1993, Santa Cruz, California.
Feminism & Psychology, 4 (1), 19-39.

Bhavnani, K. K., Phoenix, A. (1993). Editorial introduction. Shifting identities
shifting racism. Feminism & Psychology, 4 (1), 5-18.

Biglia B., Bonet J. (2008) La construcción de narrativas como método de
investigación psico-social. Prácticas de escritura compartida Enviado por
evaluación.

Biglia, B. (2005). Articulant posicionaments situats en els quefers de la
investigació activista. En Investigacció. Recerca Activista i Moviments
Socials. (pp. 105-120). Barcelona: El viejo topo.

Biglia, B., Bonet i Martí J., Martí i Costa M. (2005, en prensa). Experiencias y
reflexiones de Investigacció. En Mª Àngels Alió (Ed). Experiències de
Col·laboració entre Ciutadania i Recerca. Universitat de Barcelona,
Departament de Participació Ciutadana.

Biglia, B., Clark, J., Motzkau, J., Zavos, A. (2005). Feminisms and Activisms:
Reflections on the politics of writing and the editorial process. Annual
Review of Critical Psychology, 4, 9- 24.

Biglia, B., San Martín, C. (2005) “La creació de l’altra en la investigació
psicosocial” Investigacció Moviments socials i investigació activista. (pp.
35-46) Barcelona: El Viejo Topo.

Boudon, R. (1987). Il posto del disordine, critica delle teorie del mutamento
sociale. Bologna: Il Molino.

Brabeck, K. (2003). Testimonio: A Strategy for Collective Resistance, Cultural
Survival and Building Solidarity. Feminist & Psychology 13 (2), 252-258.

Brabeck, M. (2000). Practicing feminist ethics in psychology. Washington:
American Psychological.
Burman, E. (1994a). Interviewing. En P. Banister, E. Burman, I. Parker, M.
Taylor, C. Tindall. Qualitative Methods in psychology. A research Guide. (pp. 49-71). Bukingham: Open University Press.
Burman, E. (1994b). Feminist Research. En P. Banister, E. Burman, I. Parker, M. Taylor, C. Tindall. (1994). Qualitative Methods in Psychology. A Research Guide. (pp. 121-141). Buckingham: Open University Press.

Burman, E. (1997). Minding the gap: Positivism, Psychology, and the politics of
Qualitative Methods. Journal of Social Issue, 53, 785-802.

Burman, E. (1998). Deconstructing Feminist Psychology. London: Sage

Burman, E. (2000). Method, mesurament, and madness. En L. Holzman, J. Morss
(ed.). Postmodern psychologies, societal practice, and political life. (pp.
49-78). New York: Routledge.

Burman, E. (2003). Narratives of challenging research: stirring tales of politics
and practics. Internacional Journal of Social Methodology, 6 (2), 101-119.

Burman, E. (2003). Taking women voices: The psychological politics of
feminization. Paper presented at the British Psychological Society Psychology
of Women section Conference, Nene University at Northampton.
Burman, E., Parker, I. (eds). (1993). Discourse Analytic Research: Repertories
and readings of text in Action. London: Routledge.

Cabrera, F. (2002) Hacia una nueva concepción de la ciudadanía en una sociedad
multicultural. En Bartolomé, M. (coord.): Identidad y Ciudadanía: Un reto a
la educación interacultural. Ed. Narcea

Cabrera, F.; Marín, M.A.; Rodríguez, M.; Espín, J.V. (1998). Elaboración de un
sistema de categorías para el análisis sociométrico: su aplicación en aulas
multiculturales. Revista de Investigación Educativa,16/1: 27-45

Cabruja, T. (1998). Psicología social crítica y postmodernidad. Implicaciones
para las identidades construidas bajo la racionalidad moderna. Anthropos 177,
49-59.

Cabruja, T. (2003). Astucias de la razón y psicología crítica: condiciones de
erotismo sedución, prácticas de tokenismo y resistencias éticos-políticas.
Politíca y Sociedad, 40 (1), 141-153.

Cabruja, T., Iñiguez L., Vazquez F. (2000). Como construimos el mundo:
relativismo, espacios de relación y narratividad. Analisi 25, 61-94.

Camerun, D. (1992). Feminism and linguistic theory. Hundmmills: Mc Millan.

Campbell, R. (1995). Weaving a new Tappestry of Research. A bibliography of
Selected Reading on Feminist Research Methods. Women’s Studies International
Forum, 18/2, 215-222.

Caroline Ramazano•lu with Janet Holland. 2002. Feminist Methodology: Challenges
and Choices. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Casado, E. (1999). A vueltas con el sujeto del Feminismo. Política y Sociedad,
30, 73-91.

Castel, R. (1973). El Psicoanalismo. Orden psicoanalítico y el poder. Madrid:
Siglo XXI.

Cisnero-Puebla, C., Faux, R., Günter, M, (2004, Octuber). Investigadores
cualitativos- historias dichas, celebraciones compartida: narración de la
investigación cualitativa. Introducción al volumen especial: Entrevistas FQS
I [35 párrafos]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative
Social Research [Online Journal], 5(3), Art. 37. Available at:
http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/3-04/04-3-37-s.htm [Fecha
último acceso: 2005, agosto, 12].

Clare Madge and Henrietta O’Connor. 2002. “On-line with E-mums: Exploring the
Internet as a Medium for Research.” Area 34, no. 1: 92-102.
Collins, V. T. (1999). The speaker respoken: Material rhetoric as feminist
methodology. College English, 61(5), 545-573

Coomber, R. (1997). Using the Internet for Survey Research. Sociological Research
Online, 2 (2). Consultado el 26/06/2003 en
http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/2/2/2.html

Corsani, A. (2005). Políticas de saberes situados. La experiencia del movimientos
de los intermitentes del espectáculo. Charla introductoria en la presentación
del libro de Investigacció organizada por el colectivo Investigacció y laasociación Limes. Barcelona, Centro cívico del Surtidor, Poble Sec.
Fotocopias

Jiménez Cortés R. (2008) Aportaciones metodológicas a la investigación sobre
género en educación. Revista Fuente, 7.
Http://www.revistafuentes.org/htm/article.php?Id_volumen=7&id_article=147

Del Re, A. (1990). Qualche binomio teorico nelle pratiche politiche del
femminismo contemporaneo, Memoria n. 7.

DeVault, M. L. (1996). Talking back to sociology: Distinctive contributions of
feminist methodology. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 29-50.

Donini, E. (1991). Conversazioni con Evelyn Fox Keller, una scienziata anomala.
Roma: Eleuthera.

Donna Luff. 1999. “Dialogue Across the Divides: ‘Moments of Rapport’ and Power in
Feminist Research with Anti-Feminist Women.” Sociology 33, no. 4: 687-703.

Dressel, G., Langreit, N. (2003). When ‘we ourselves’ become our own field of
research. Forum Qualitative Socialforschung/ Forum: Qualitative Social
Research [on line journal], 4(2) [32 paragraphs]. Aviable at
http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2-03/2-03dressellangreitere.
htm [Date of Access: September 01, 2004].

Eduards, M. (1994). Women’s agency and collective action. Women's studies
international forum 17, 2/3, 181-186.

Eichler, M., Nonsexist Research Methods: A Practical Guide (Allen & Unwin, 1988).

Emirbayer, M., Goodwin, J. (1994). Network analysis, culture and problem of
agency. The American Journal of sociology, 99 (6), 1411-1454.

Espín, J.V. (2002) Educación, ciudadanía y género En M. Bartolomé (Coord.).
Identidad y ciudadanía: un reto a la educación intercultural. Madrid: Narcea

Ewick, P. (1994). Integrating feminist epistemologies in undergraduate research
methods. Gender and Society, 8(1), 92-108.
Fernandez, M., Wilding, F. (2002). El contexto de los cyberfeminismos. Debats,
76, 92-99.

Fine, M., Torres, M., (2004). Re-membering exclusions: participatory action
research in public institution. Qualitative Research in Psychology 1, 15-37.

Fonow, M. M., & Cook, J. A. (2005). Feminist methodology: New applications in the
academy and public policy. Signs, 30(4, New Feminist Approaches to Social
Science Methodologies), 2211-2236.

Fonow, M.M., and J.A. Cook (Eds.), Beyond Methodology: Feminist Scholarship as
Lived Research (Indiana

Francesca M. Cancian. 1996. “Participatory Research and Alternative Strategies
for Activist Sociology.” Pp. 187-205 in Feminism and Social Change, ed. Heidi
Gottfried. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Gesa E. Kirsch. 2005. “Friendship, Friendliness, and Feminist Fieldwork.” Signs:
Journal of Women in Culture and Society 30, no. 4: 2163-2172.

Gordo López, A., Linaza, J.L. (1996) (eds). Psicologías, Discursos y Poder (PDP).
Madrid: Visor.

Gorelick, S. (1991). Contradictions of feminist methodology. Gender and Society,
5(4), 459-477.

Guha, R., Spivak, G. C. (2002). Subaltern Studies. Modernità e (post)colonialismo.
Verona: Ombre Corte.

Hables Gray, C., Mentor, S., Figueroa-Sarriera, H. (1995). Cyberology:
constructing the knowledge of cybernetic organism. En C. Hables Gray, H.Figueroa-Sarriera, S. Mentor The cyborg handbook. (pp. 1- 14). London, New
York: Routledge.

Haraway, D (1999). Las promesas de los monstruos: Una política regeneradora para
otros inapropiados/bles. Política y Sociedad, 30, 121-163.

Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New
York: Routledge.

Haraway, D. (1997). enlightment@science_wars.com: A personal reflection on love
and war. Social Text, 50, 123-129.

Haraway, D. (2004). Testigo_Modesto@Segundo_Milenio. Hombrehembra
_Conoce_Oncoratón Feminismo y tecnociencia. Barcelona: UOC.

Harding, J., Sutoris, M. (1989). An object relation account of differential
involvement of boys and girls in sciencie and thecnology. En A. Kelly Science
for Girls? Milton Keynes: Open University.

Harding, S. (1986). The science question in Feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University.

Harding, S. (1987). Feminist and methodology. Milton Keynes: Open Univerity.

Harding, S. (1992). Whose science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking for women’s lives.
Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Harding, S. (1996). Ciencia y feminismo. Madrid: Morada.

Harding, S. (2003). How Standpoint Methodology Informs Phylosophy of Social
Science. Paper presented at University College Cork, Irleand, 4th Abril 2003:
Fotocópias.

Harding, S.(Ed.), Feminism & Methodology (Indiana University Press, 1987).

Hari Kunzru (1999). Tu eres cyborg, Para Donna Haraway ya estamos asimilad@s.
Mujeres Preokupando, 2 (2), 6.

Hoofd, I. (2004). Dialogues between Paul Virilio and Chela Sandoval. Towards a
better understanding of uses and abuses of new technologies. Genders, 39 .
Disponible en http://www.genders.org/g39/g39_hoofd.html

hooks, b. (1984). El poder de descreer. En S. Chejter (Ed) El sexo natural del
estado. (pp. 159-172). Montevideo: Piedra Libre.

hooks, b. (1991). Elogio del margine. Razza, sesso e mercato culture. Milano:
Feltrinelli.

hooks, b. (1997). Sisterhood: Political Solidarity between women. En D. Tietjens
Meyers Feminist Social Thought: A Reader. (pp. 484-500). New York, London:
Routledge.

hooks, b. (2000). Feminist theory from margin to centre. London: Pluto Press.
Jhonson, S. (1997). Gender diference in sciencie: parallels in interest,
experience and performance. International Jurnal of cience Education, 9 (4),
467-481.

Jones, S. (1998). Doing internet research, Critical issues and Methods for
examining the net. London: Sage.

Joyce McCarl Nielsen, Robyn Marschke, Elisabeth Sheff, and Patricia Rankin. 2005.
“Vital Variables and Gender Equity in Academe: Confessions from a Feminist
Empiricist Project.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 31, no.
1: 1-28.

Judith Stacey. 1996. “Can There Be a Feminist Ethnography?” Pp. 88-103 in
Feminism and Social Change: Bridging Theory and Practice, ed. Heidi
Gottfried. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Kelly, A. (1989) (Comp.). Science for girls?. Philadelphia: Open University,
Mitton Keyness.

King, A., Hyman, A. (1999). Women's Studies and the internet: a future with a
history. Resources for feminist research 27 (1/2) Summer, 13-23.

Kirby, S., and K. McKenna. Experience, Research and Social Change: Methods from
the Margins (Garamond, 1989).

Lather, P., Feminist Research in Education: Within/Against (Deakin University,
1991).

Lather, P., Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy Within/in the
Postmodern (Routledge, 1991).
Leila J. Rupp. 1997. “How Wide the Circle of the Feminist ‘We.’” Pp. 130-155 and
268-276 in Worlds of Women: The Making of An International Women’s Movement.
Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Lohan, M. (2000). Come back public/private; (Almost) All is forgiven . Using
feminist methodologies in researching information communication technologies.
Women's Studies Internatioanal Forum 23 (1), 107-117.
Lois Presser. 2005. “Negotiating Power and Narrative in Research: Implications
for Feminist Methodology.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 30,
no. 4: 2067-2090.

Macdonald, M. (1995). Feminist economics: From theory to research. The Canadian
Journal of Economics / Revue Canadienne d'Economique, 28(1), 159-176.

Malo, M. (2004) (coord.). Nociones comunes. Experiencias y ensayos entre
investigación y militancia. Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.

Mann, P. (1994). Micro-Politics. Agency in a postfeminist era. Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota.

Martinez, C., Pastor, R., De la Pascua, M.J., Tavarera, S. (2000) (dir.) Mujeres
en la historia de España. Barcelona: Planeta.

Maynard, M. Purvis, J. (1994). Researching Woman's lives from a feminist
perspective. London: Taylor & Francis.

Michael Messner and Jeffrey Montez de Oca. 2005. “The Male Consumer as Loser:
Beer and Liquor Ads in Mega Sports Media Events.” Signs: Journal of Women in
Culture and Society 30, no. 3: 1879-1909.

Moreno Marimon, M., Sastre, G. (2000). Repensar la ética desde una perspectiva de
género. Intervención psicosocial, 9 (1), 35-48.
Multitude, monografico: Feminisme, Queer, Multitudes. 2003 Primtemps, Vol.12.
Pairis: Exil, Association Multitude. En http://multitudes.samizdat.net/
Nebraska Sociological Feminist Collective, A Feminist Ethic for Social Science
Research (Edwin Mellon Press, 1988).

Nicholson, L. J. (1990) (eds). Feminism/Postmodernism. London: Routledge.

Nielsen, J.M., Feminist Research Methods: Exemplary Readings in the Social
Sciences (Westview Press, 1990).

Nobile, L. (2003). Platone, Internet e Kant contro i ‘padroni del discorso’.
Un’intervista a Maria Chiara Pievatolo. Infoxoa 017, 13-16.
OLESEN, V (1994) Feminisms and Models of Qualitative Research, en N. DENZIN E Y.

LINCOLN (Eds.): Handbook of Qualitative Research,. Sage. Londres, 158-174.

pantera rosa (2004). Moverse en la incertidumbre. Dudas y contradicciones de la
investigación activista. En M. Malo (comp.) Nociones comunes. Experiencias y
ensayos entre investigación y militancia. Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.

Parker, I., Burman, E. (1993). Against discursive imperialism, empiricism and
constructionism: thirty-two problems with discourse analysis. En E. Burman,

I. Parker (Ed.) Repertoires and readings of texts in action. (pp.155-172).
London: Routledge.

Pateman, C. (1996). Críticas feministas a la dicotomía publico/privado. En C.
Castells (comp.) Perspectivas feministas en teoría política. (pp. 31-52).
Barcelona: Paidos.

Pievatolo, M. C. (2003a). Information as public domain. A philosophical argument
against intellectual privat property. Guest lecture at the III Congreso
Mundial de Derechos e Informática. En Bollettino telematico di filosofia
pólitica. Disponible on-line en
http://bfp.sp.unipi.it/english/art/pievatol.htm
Pitman, G. (2002). Outsider/Insider: The politics of shifting identities in the
research process. Feminist & Psychology 12 (2), 282-288.

Plant, S. (1998). Cero + Uno. Barcelona: Destino.

Precarias a la Deriva (2004). A la deriva por los circuitos de la precariedad
feminina. Madrid: Traficantes de sueños.

Presser, L. (2005). Negotiating power and narrative in research: Implications for
feminist methodology. Signs, 30(4, New Feminist Approaches to Social Science
Methodologies), 2067-2090.

Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2000). Feminist Knowledge politic in situated zones. A
diferent hi/story of knowledge construction En
http://www.women.it/cyberarchive/files/puig.htm
Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2001). Flexible girls. A position paper on accademic
genderational politics. En L. Passerini, D. Lyon, L. Borghi (eds.) Gender studies in Europe/Studi di genere in Europa. European University Institute,
Università di Firenze, ATHENA.

Pujal, M. (2003). La tarea crítica: interconexiones entre lenguaje, deseo y
subjetividad. Política y Sociedad, 40/1, 129-140.

Pujol, J., Montenegro, M., Balasch, M. (2003). Los límites de la metáfora
lingüística: implicaciones de una perspectiva corporeizada para la práctica
investigadora e interventora. Politica y Sociedad, 40/1, 57-70.

Puwar N.. 1997. “Reflections on Interviewing Women MP’s.” Sociological Research
Online 2, no. 1.

Quina, K., Miller, D. (2000). Feminist Cyberethics. En M.M. Brabeck (eds.)
Practicing Feminist Ethics in Psychology. (pp. 143-165) London: Routledge.
Revista de Investigación Educativa 18/1: 223 -242
Roberts, H. (Ed.), Doing Feminist Research (Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981).

Rubio Alcover, C. (2002). Postcolonialismo y deconstrución: El pensamiento
feminista de Gayatri Spivak. Debats 76, 66-80.
Rupp, L. J., & Taylor, V. (1999). Forging feminist identity in an international
movement: A collective identity approach to twentieth-century feminism.
Signs, 24(2), 363-386.

Sandín, M.P. (1998) Una experiencia de intervención en el ámbito de la
orientación multicultural desde la investigación-acción. 29-41 En R.
Bisquerra y M. Álvarez (Coord.), Manual de orientación y tutoría. Editorial
Praxis

Sandín, M.P. (2000) Criterios de validez en la investigación cualitativa: de la
objetividad a la solidaridad
Sandoval, C. (1995). New Sciences. Cyborg femminism and the methodology of the
oppressed. En C. Hables Gray The cyborg handbook. (pp. 407-422). New York,
London: Routledge

Schwedler, Jillian. 2006. “The Third Gender: Western Female Researchers in the
Middle East.” PS 39, no. 3: 425-428.
Sharlene Nagy Hesse-Biber and Michelle L. Yaiser. 2004. Feminist Perspectives on
Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press.
Shulamit Reinharz. 1992. “Feminist Action Research.” Pp. 175-196 in Reinharz.

Shulamit Reinharz. 1992. “Feminist Content Analysis.” Pp. 145-163 in Reinharz.

Shulamit Reinharz. 1992. “Feminist Interview Research.” Pp. 18-45 in Reinharz.

Shulamit Reinharz. 1992. “Feminist Survey Research and Other Statistical Research
Formats.” Pp. 76-94 in Reinharz. Shulamit Reinharz. 1992. “Original Feminist Research Methods.” Pp. 214-239 in Reinharz. Shulamit Reinharz. 1992. Feminist Methods in Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press.

Spelman, E. (1997). Woman: the one and the many. En Tietjens Meyers, D. (eds) Feminist social thought: a reader. (pp. 160-179). London: Routledge.

Sprague, J. (2005, Aug) Feminist Methodology: Stereotypes & Standpoints Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Marrito Hotel, Loews Philadelphia Hotel, Philadelphia, PA Online

Stanley, L. (Ed.), Feminist Praxis: Research, Theory and Epistemology in Feminist
Sociology (Routledge, 1990).

Stanley, L., and S. Wise. Breaking Out: Feminist Consciousness and Feminist Research (Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983).
Sue Wilkinson. 2004. “Focus Groups: A Feminist Method.” Pp. 271-295 in Hesse-Biber and Yaiser.

Taylor, M. (1994a). Action Research. En P. Banister, E. Burman, I. Parker, M. Taylor, C. Tindall Qualitative Methods in Psychology. A Research Guid.e (pp.108-120). Buckingham: Open University Press.

Taylor, V. (2000). Emotion and identities in women’s self help movements. En S. Stryker, T. Owens, A. White (ed.) Self, Identity and social movements. (pp.
271-99). Minneapolis: Minnesota Press.

Taylor, V. (2000). Mobilizing for change in a social movement society.
Contemporary Sociology, 29(1, Utopian Visions: Engaged Sociologies for the
21st Century), 219-230.

Taylor, V. (2000). Utopian vision: Engaged sociologies for the 21st century
Contemporary Sociology, 29 (1), 219-230.

Tetyana Pudrovska and Myra Marx Ferree. 2004. “Global Activism in ‘Virtual
Space’: The European Women’s Lobby in the Network of Transnational Women’s
NGO’s on the Web.” Social Politics 11, no. 1: 117-143 (Skim).
Thompson, L. (1992). Feminist methodology for family studies. Journal of Marriage
and the Family, 54(1), 3-18.
University Press, 1991)

Verta Taylor, “Feminist Methodology in Social Movements Research,” Qualitative
Sociology 21, no. 4: 357-379.

Vila, F. (1999). Genealogías feministas. Contribuciones de la perspectiva radical
a los estudios de las mujeres. Politica y Sociedad, 32, 43-51.

Wilkinson, S. (1998). Focus groups in feminist research: power, interaction, an
the co-construction of the meaning. Feminist and Psychology, 21 (1), 111-125.

Woodward, C. N. (1998). Girls and Science: does a core curriculum in primary
school cause for optimism?. Gender Education, 10(4), 387-400.

Zavos A., Biglia B. (2008, aceptado para publicacion) “Embodying feminist
research: learning from action research, political practices, diffractions and
collective knowledge.” International Journal of Critical Psychology.

Zavos, A., Biglia, B., Hoofd, I. (2005). ‘Questioning’ the Political Implications of Feminist Activism and Research in Different Settings. CASAzine, 1, 4-6.